There is also some disagreement on the allowed number of parallel sides in a trapezoid. At issue is whether parallelograms, which have two pairs of parallel sides, should be counted as trapezoids. Some authors[2] define a trapezoid as a quadrilateral having exactly one pair of parallel sides, thereby excluding parallelograms. Other authors[3] define a trapezoid as a quadrilateral with at least one pair of parallel sides, making the parallelogram a special type of trapezoid (along with the rhombus, the rectangle and the square). The latter definition is consistent with its uses in higher mathematics such as calculus. The former definition would make such concepts as the trapezoidal approximation to a definite integral be ill-defined.
~From Wikipedia
回應
WENDYCHI
Re: 超級陷阱題
2011-01-01 08:548或9
很難嗎?
simon89889
Re: 超級陷阱題
2011-01-01 09:00hansonyu123
Re: 超級陷阱題
2011-01-01 09:41梯形只有一邊平行吧?
zaq1bgt5cde3mju7
Re: 超級陷阱題
2011-01-01 10:58果然這裡的人都比較厲害
其他一堆人都答8,9,10
程度更爛的會答:1,2,3,4,5,6,,8,9,10
梯形定義是一組對邊平行,另一組對邊不平行的四邊形
X=10的話是一雙對邊平行且相等,是平行四邊形而非梯形
還有一次竟然在學校夜輔看到類似的這種題目
標準答案還忽略了這件事,也就是標準答案中彈
所以才決定放上來
simon89889
Re: 超級陷阱題
2011-01-01 12:14所以這只是想看看你有沒有清楚梯形定義?
longlong
Re: 超級陷阱題
2011-01-01 17:19~From Wikipedia
所以要說平行四邊形是梯形應該也是可以吧
LeoWang
Re: 超級陷阱題
2011-01-03 21:56不行吧!梯形的定義是只有一組對邊平行的四邊形,平行四邊形有兩組喔!
ricktu
Re: 超級陷阱題
2011-01-03 21:58你沒看那段英文
連中文維基都有說:"廣義中,平行四邊形是梯形,因為它有一對邊平行。狹義中,平行四邊形並不是梯形,因為它有二對邊平行。"
hansonyu123
Re: 超級陷阱題
2011-01-03 22:00這就要看看大家對這個題目的看法囉!
WENDYCHI
Re: 超級陷阱題
2011-01-03 22:01看情況吧
我在國小的選擇題有這題
當時平行四邊形不算梯形
後來我學乖了
不過其實梯形公式可帶平行四邊形
hansonyu123
Re: 超級陷阱題
2011-01-03 22:11集合梯形是集合平行四邊形裡的子集
所以梯形公式適用於平行四邊形
LeoWang
Re: 超級陷阱題
2011-01-03 22:12......那我想出題老師應該是站在狹義那邊的